Last week, US embassy in Khartoum issued statement urging Sudan and South Sudan to form demilitarized area immediately and unconditionally. The statement tends to escalate the Sudanese-South Sudanese differences to go in line with US wishes. US doesn’t care about who will die or live; it's only  concerned with its personal interests. 

 

The statement which lacks diplomatic etiquette has used special discourse - "immediate" and "unconditional" -which only suits international bodies and not diplomatic missions.

The statement is a big mistake and that US worries about clashes between Sudan and South Sudan are untrue. South Sudanese army is controlling undisputed areas and supporting Sudan Liberation Movement-North and Sudanese Revolutionary Front rebels to attack Darfur and South Kordofan.

The statement is unsuccessful because the current situation is consequent of Juba's repeated breach of the joint cooperation agreement. Logically and naturally, Washington has to pressure Juba to abide by the agreement especially security arrangements, formation of demilitarized zone and disengagement with SPLM-N.

US has to put in its mind that Sudan doesn't weigh warring. The opposite is true since the former is pushing the two parties to war to pave the way for Security Council's intervention. This proposition is supported by the statement and preliminary scenarios.

US diplomacy is based on intervention when intervention is required, so it is fanning the differences to the maximum to create adequate chance to get rid of the undesired party.

Although the statement discourse has equally addressed the two parties to look impartial and fair, it was directed mainly to Sudan.