|
Sudan has been called the “food basket” of the Arab world for ages. While most Arab countries lack water, Sudan has far more than it needs.
The Nile River, with its two branches, the White and the Blue, meeting in Khartoum, brings life to a land the size of Europe. It was called the Sudan (meaning black in Arabic) because of the color of its soil. The generous Nile brings the fertile soil from its origins in Uganda and Ethiopia to enrich the land on its banks. Egypt, too, used to enjoy this gift before its late president Gamal Abdel Nasser built the Aswan Dam in the 1960s, preventing the fertile soil from being carried northward.
After independence from Great Britain in 1956 and separation from the Kingdom of Egypt and Sudan, civic progress and development in Sudan was slowed by civil wars and political turmoil.
Today, with the end of the long war between the South and North and the relative calm of the Darfur conflict, the Sudanese government is finally giving its full attention to building and enriching the improvised country.
On the other hand, the world, and especially our part of it, is facing serious water and food shortages. With global warming and the increase in population, everyone is looking for guaranteed food resources. Saudi Arabia has been working on this problem for many years now. King Abdullah’s Agriculture Initiative calls for private investments in Asian and African countries, starting with neighbours like Ethiopia and Sudan. Many investors, like Sheikh Mohammed Hussien Al-Amoudi, have answered the king’s call. With generous government loans and support, they have heavily invested in developing agriculture in Sudan’s non-Arab neighbor, Ethiopia.
So, is it about time we go further north to develop Sudan? On the surface, it makes prefect sense. The country has all the basic ingredients: water, fertile soil, roads, ports, airports, electricity, human resources, and peace.
When I visited Sudan in 2002, with Prince Mohammed Al-Faisal, chairman of Faisal Bank, the country had a weak infrastructure and poor services. It has developed considerably since. Then, it was engaged in civil wars in the south, west and east of the country. Today, it is much more secure and peaceful. However, two problems persist — bureaucracy and injustice. Like many Third World countries, laws are not always respected. And when they are followed, it is not always for the best.
Too much red tape frustrates and chases away local, let alone foreign, investors. Obstinate bureaucrats who ignore, delay or refuse to implement even court and executive orders are formidable obstacles.
In 1989, for example, a Saudi investor and his Sudanese partner organised a successful Saudi export fair in the capital, Khartoum. It was hailed as a gate which would lead to stronger commercial ties. However, when the fair ended, the organisers were not allowed to retain possession of their show materials as promised, and therefore lost millions of dollars. They sued and won a court verdict to get government compensation. The president ordered immediate implementation. More than 20 years later, the investors still have not been paid.
Such incidents frighten enthusiastic Saudi investors. They may have the best of intentions and want to invest in a dear, neighbouring Arab country, but if they cannot be certain of a fair, welcoming and orderly business environment, they will not risk their precious time, hard labour and valuable cash.
My advice to the Sudanese is to provide such an environment before inviting investors. Providing regulations and a commission with all the needed power to implement them will certainly help. The free transfer of hard currency, in and out, is a must. And all unsettled cases should be resolved. Without such steps, I really cannot recommend Saudi investment in dear Sudan. No one should risk hard-earned capital in a bureaucratic jungle.
From the Editor
The above article clearly reflects the fear of our sisterly countries’ investors.
It is a message to the ministry concerned which we are sure is now working out a serious plan to attract investment into the country considering that the venue of decision-making on investment is now inside the gates of the Republican Palace to ease policies and procedures.
It goes without saying that arable land in Sudan, if utilised to the maximum, could translate the term (Arab Food Basket) into reality.
The Investment Encouragement Act should be initiated to avoid all the previous negative practises through new articles that enable investors to bring their money and expertise into the country with complete satisfaction that they will be supported by concerned authorities. |